Attempts to detect florigen have not been successful, mainly because
of the lack of a suitable bioassay system. To establish a bioassay system
for detecting florigen we need samples with apparent florigen activity,
but again we cannot obtain such active samples because a suitable bioassay
system is not available. This is a vicious circle.
Generally, the sample has to be incorporated efficiently by the assay plant. The sample is applied to the surface of the assay plant in many bioassay systems. The plant tissue surface has a function to prevent the intrusion of invading substances. Therefore, macromolecules such as proteins and nucleic acids may not be incorporated into the plant tissue by this application method, although known plant hormones and small active compounds can be incorporated. The chemical nature of florigen is unknown, and the possibility that it is a macromolecule can not be excluded. Furthermore, florigen is believed to move only in living tissue. Therefore, it is said that the sample may not be incorporated from the cut-end of a shoot even in an in vitro assay using a shoot apex. Considering these problems, the so-called perfusion system may be a theoretically better assay method. In this system, the aqueous sample solution is forced directly into the apoplast of the assay plant from the cut-end of stem using compressed air.
Another problem is that the failure to detect flowering activity by
the bioassay does not always mean that the assayed substance does not have
the activity. The assay plants would not detect any activity, if the assay
sample was deactivated by the assay plants, or when the assay plants did
not have the sensitivity to the substance given. Many problems remain to
be solved before the bioassay system for detecting florigen can be established.
|